My Thoughts on Building a Better Clinician Value-Based Payment Program in Medicare
I think the factors and discussion outlined here apply to all payers transitioning from FFS to value. The bottom line is that you can only do so much with the FFS chassis as the foundation to your value programs. For commercial payers, this presents an important problem that is often not discussed… benefit design and translating the value to purchasers. In many cases the entire business model, from product to distribution channel (think consultants and brokers) to large employers, is based on a measurement of value based on a discount of charges. This archaic metric persists but is buried within the overall process and is only rarely discussed by those trying to transition to value. Employers need to insist on a more contemporary definition of value from their consultants and the plans.
I think my colleague Joe gets the overview right .. “At their core, risk-based models should inspire the flexibility to deliver care in the manner... Read More
There is much to unpack here. Trust, Influence and Adherence are tied together. I have rambled on at length about the health care delivery system... Read More
Value-Based Care is Evolving
Let Us Help You Evolve with it
For organizations working to manage alignment, risk and changes
Nascate provides the insight and support you need.
Our value-based care framework builds on the work you’re already doing and provides you with innovative solutions to tackle today’s challenges and grow toward sustainability.